"The Cost of Doing Nothing" -- A Report by the Immigration Policy Center
What will be the price in dollars, lives, and opportunities lost if Congress fails to act on immigration reform?
See the full report at http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/cost-doing-nothing
Immigration advocates announce plans for demonstrations across country
By David Nakamura, Published: September 26 at 1:31 pm
Immigration advocates announced plans Thursday for rallies in dozens of cities Oct. 5 to pressure Congress to approve legislation to overhaul the nation's border control laws and demand an end to mass deportations of the undocumented.
The National Day for Dignity and Respect will be a prelude to a rally and concert on the Mall on Oct. 8, during which thousands are expected to demonstrate in support of comprehensive immigration reform, the organizers said. The goal is to keep a spotlight on the issue even as Congress and the White House are engaged in fierce battles over the budget and debt ceiling, which are threatening to push immigration off the agenda.
The advocates said their focus would be primarily on House Republicans, who have declined to support a Senate-approved immigration bill that features a path to citizenship for most of the nation's 11 million undocumented workers and students.
"The House may try to delay and deny our efforts," said Richard Morales, detention prevention coordinator for the Campaign for Citizenship of PICO National Network. "That translates into a situation of crisis for hundreds of thousands of immigrant families across the county each and every day."
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), a leading voice on immigration, said that within the next 40 days, a total of 2 million unauthorized immigrants would have been deported since President Obama took office in 2009. The administration is deporting more than 1,000 people a day, and advocates have increasingly called on the president to use his executive authority to defer the deportations. Obama has said he cannot do so because it would violate federal law.
Gutierrez acknowledged that immigration has fallen further down the agenda amid the fiscal fights, calling it a "very tough, dark tunnel" to get a comprehensive bill approved this year. But he added that Congress "should understand we're not going away. The deportations are continuing and continue to have a devastating effect."
See the entire article at
AILA Quicktake #51: The Cost of Doing Nothing
Watch this short video from the American Immigration Lawyers Association on the Cost of Doing Nothing with Immigration Reform.
Daily Immigration News Clips – September 25, 2013
Houston Chronicle: Nancy Pelosi floats new strategy to pressure GOP on immigration
By Carolyn Lochead
By Carolyn Lochead
ADDITIONAL HOUSE BILL REACTIONS
International Business Times: Advocates, Opponents Not Taking Pelosi's Proposed Plan Seriously
By Laura Matthews
New York Times: House Democrats Crafting Immigration Proposal
By Ashley Parker
Houston Chronicle: Filemon Vela, border politicians resurrecting immigration reform
By Rachel Jackson
STATE DEVELOPMENTS
San Diego Union Tribune (California): Catholic colleges push for immigration reform
By Elizabeth Aguilera
San Diego Union Tribune (California): Lawmakers out of step on immigration?
By Elizabeth Aguilera
KCBS (California): San Francisco Considers Limiting Police Cooperation With Immigration Officials
Aspen Daily News (Colorado): Aspen chamber endorses immigration bill
By Nelsen Harvey
Associated Press (Texas): Applicants wrongly denied US citizenship: court
By Christopher Sherman
OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
Washington Post: ACLU, immigrant groups to keep an eye on U.S. Border Patrol after profiling-case win
By Manuel Valdes
Fox News Latino: Dream9 Reloaded: Now 30 Will Attempt To Reenter The U.S. Without Documents
OPINIONS
Wall Street Journal (Opinion): Immigration Compromise?
By Jason Riley
Washington Post (Blog): Immigration reform is on life support, but it isn't dead yet
By Greg Sargent
By Steve Benen
Bloomberg (Opinion): Who's That Knocking Again at the Door?
By Megan McArdle
Houston Chronicle: Nancy Pelosi floats new strategy to pressure GOP on immigration
By Carolyn Lochead
House Democrats Crafting Immigration Proposal
September
24, 2013
By ASHLEY
PARKER
House Democratic leaders are working on a
broad immigration proposal that they hope will reinvigorate the debate on
Capitol Hill and pressure their Republican counterparts to pass legislation
that includes a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented
immigrants already in the country.
With an
immigration overhaul languishing in the Republican-controlled House, taking a
back seat to the fiscal fights that promise to occupy most of the fall,
Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, began working
with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, as well as with Representative Xavier
Becerra of California, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, to put forth
an alternative bill that she said she believes could garner bipartisan support.
Though no
final decisions have been made, aides familiar with the strategy said,
Democratic leadership hopes to introduce the bill in the next few weeks. Ms.
Pelosi met repeatedly — in person and over the phone — with the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus over the past two weeks, working closely with Representative
Ruben Hinojosa of Texas, the group’s chairman. .
The
proposal would combine the broad immigration bill that passed through the
Senate Judiciary Committee in May with bipartisan support, as well as a border
security bill that also passed the House Homeland Security Committee in May
with overwhelming bipartisan support.
The
border-security component, drafted by Representative Michael McCaul of Texas,
chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, requires the Department of
Homeland Security to draft a plan to gain operation control — defined as a 90
percent apprehension rate of those who have crossed illegally — of the Southwest
border within five years.
Ms.
Pelosi’s proposal, however, does not include the border security amendment
tacked on at the end of the Senate process in June, and spearheaded by two
Republican senators, Bob Corker of Tennessee and John Hoeven of North Dakota.
Though the Corker-Hoeven amendment helped garner the support of roughly a dozen
Republicans for the overall bill, promising $40 billion over the next decade to
secure the southern border — including doubling the number of border agents to
40,000 and completing 700 miles of fencing — many were wary of the border
security plan, which they said was a waste of money and would “militarize” the
border.
House
Democrats said their proposal will, in the words of one aide, “shake up the
environment” and offer an option that can win bipartisan support.
“Any
member of the House — Democrat or Republican, who wants comprehensive
immigration reform — can support this bill,” the aide said. “This is something
that can get the support of House Republicans who have said they’re for a bill,
and obviously we believe there are more that would vote for this at the end of
the day.
“There are
certainly enough votes in the House to get this bill across the line.”
Though the
bill would most likely pass with the help of Democratic votes, Speaker John A.
Boehner of Ohio would still have to agree to put the proposal on the floor for
a vote, something he has been hesitant to do. The goal, Democratic aides said,
is to create a situation where House Republicans are pressured to either vote
on this plan — or to offer an alternative of their own, which very likely
includes at least some form of legalization, and could proceed to negotiations
between the House and the Senate.
“Leader
Pelosi is proposing something closer to her ideal bill, and her intention is to
keep the House moving forward, which is a good thing,” said Senator Charles E.
Schumer, a Democrat from New York and a member of the bipartisan group in the
Senate that drafted its immigration overhaul.
Though Democratic leaders had
already begun talking about this new immigration strategy in recent weeks, the
plan became particular urgent after two Texas Republican congressmen, John
Carter and Sam Johnson, last week dropped out of a bipartisan group in the
House that was hoping to introduce its own broad immigration plan.
Obama on Track to Deport a Record 2 Million People by 2014
If this rate continues, this administration will deport as many people as were from 1892 to 1997 combined.
February 1, 2013
At current rates, deportations enforced under the Obama presidency are set to hit 2 million by 2014 according to a new report from the University of California-Merced. Findings highlight that, if current deportation rates continue, nearly as many people will have been deported under this administration than during the entirety of years between 1892 and 1997. These are striking statistics to consider while Congress debates the president’s commitment to immigration enforcement.
The report notes that under Obama, the deportation of convicted criminals has been a focus and a point of pride for the administration. However, as immigrant justice advocates have often stressed, the report points out that “many of these criminal deportees are deported after a minor criminal conviction”:
In 2011, 188,382 people were deported on criminal grounds. Nearly a quarter were deported after a drug conviction, another 23% for traffic crimes, and one in five for immigration crimes. The DHS does not get very specific about these convictions, but we do know that drug crimes include marijuana possession; traffic crimes include speeding; and immigration crimes include illegal entry and re-entry.
It is likely that large numbers of people apprehended through the Criminal Alien Program are minor drug offenders and immigration offenders. Additionally, it is likely that the Criminal Alien Program is tearing apart families. One study found that, on average, people deported after being convicted of a crime had lived 14 years in the United States.
The report also notes that nearly one-quarter of deportees since mid-2010 are parents of children in the U.S. — a fact connected to the increased focus on criminal deportations. “The focus on criminal deportations has led to enhanced interior enforcement, and that this in turn is the reason so many parents of U.S. citizens are being deported,” the report claims. Its author Tanya Golash-Boza, an associate professor of sociology who is writing a book about immigration enforcement told HuffPo, “On the one hand Obama gets to say, ‘I’ve deported all of these criminals… On the other hand, not only are the people minor criminals, but they’re also much more likely to be people that are living, working, have children in the United States than even just a few years ago.”
Although unmentioned in Tanya Golash-Boza’s study, a recent report from the Migration Policy Institute noted that the U.S. spends more on immigration enforcement than on all other federal law enforcement combined. And, as Human Rights Watch noted in their World Report this week, “illegal re-entry into the U.S. has become the most prosecuted federal crime. In 2011, prosecutions for illegal entry and re-entry into the U.S. surpassed 34,000 and 37,000 respectively. Many of those prosecuted for these crimes have minor or no criminal history and have substantial ties to the US.”
Supporters of immigration reform believe these figures serve as a riposte to lawmakers, predominantly Republicans, who say federal authorities must do much more to strengthen enforcement before Congress can consider any legalization for the U.S.’s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.
Supporters of immigration reform believe these figures serve as a riposte to lawmakers, predominantly Republicans, who say federal authorities must do much more to strengthen enforcement before Congress can consider any legalization for the U.S.’s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.
Feds' immigration-hold policy misguided
George Ga1,
Immigration holds....
See the entire
article at http://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Feds-immigration-hold-policy-misguided-4803416.php?t=81bb8afb2906eebef0
George Gascón
September 11, 2013
In my 30
years in law enforcement, I have often witnessed the unintended consequences of
well-meaning but poorly developed public safety policies. Few have had as
profound an impact on our constitutional rights as the widespread use of
immigration holds issued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. What the
federal government touts as a sound public safety practice is having a chilling
effect on local law enforcement's effectiveness.
In 2010, Norma, an
undocumented immigrant living in San Francisco, was held on an immigration hold
in our local jail for days without due process. Norma, repeatedly abused by her
partner, had been too fearful to call police. When she finally did, she was arrested
along with her abuser, even though no charges were filed against her. While her
deportation was eventually canceled, Norma recalls being "so scared not
knowing what would happen to my 3-year-old child while I was in jail. I later
discovered that I had an immigration hold, even though no one told me what was
happening."
IMMIGRATION NEWS -- OPINIONS
San Francisco Chronicle (Opinion): Feds' immigration-hold policy
misguided
By George Gascón
By George Gascón
Orlando Sun Sentinel (Florida-Opinion): Congress avoids question by stalling
on immigration
By Guillermo Martinez
By Guillermo Martinez
Jersey Journal (New Jersey-Opinion): A portrait of immigrants looking for
work as Catholic dioceses advocate for immigration reform
By Rev. Alexander Santora
By Rev. Alexander Santora
Southeast Missourian (Missouri-Opinion): Small steps key to effective immigration reform
By Wayne Bowen
By Wayne Bowen
International Business Times: 2013 Immigration Reform Makes Cantor's
Legislative Agenda, But Uncertainty Remains Over Undocumented
By Laura Matthews
By Laura Matthews
California governor to sign driver's license bill for illegal immigrants
http://news.yahoo.com/california-governor-sign-drivers-license-bill-illegal-immigrants-153907339.html
Brown said he approved of the measure, which its author had withdrawn on Thursday under the threat of a veto, capping a full day of lobbying by California politicians for immigration reform at the federal level.
"This bill will enable millions of people to get to work safely and legally," Brown, a Democrat, said in an email sent to reporters shortly after midnight. "Hopefully it will send a message to Washington that immigration reform is long past due."
Over the past year, nine states and the District of Columbia have passed laws enabling undocumented immigrants to drive legally. In California, lawmakers and governors have routinely rebuffed such efforts.
Just on Thursday, Assemblyman Luis Alejo, a Democrat from the agricultural town of Salinas, told Reuters that he was withdrawing the bill he had written until next year, largely because of concerns expressed by Brown.
The governor, Alejo said, wanted to make sure the new licenses complied with federal law requiring them to clearly indicate the driver was undocumented.
For example, he said, Utah licenses for people who cannot show they are in the country legally bear the words "temporary visitor's driver license" on the front.
Alejo said he would prefer California's licenses to be more discreet, with small wording on the back indicating that the license was not to be used for identification purposes.
He withdrew the bill, promising to bring it up again next year. But late in the day on Thursday, just hours before the legislature recessed for the year, Alejo accepted amendments that would make the distinction more clear.
After Brown's objections were satisfied, both houses of the state legislature quickly passed the bill, with a number of Republicans joining the Democratic majority to vote for it.
It was approved by votes of 28-8 in the California Senate and 55-19 in the Assembly.
"We need those living here and sharing our roads to be educated and insured," said Republican state Senator Anthony Cannella. "There are both social and financial reasons to provide licenses to immigrants who are part of our communities."
Latino organizations and immigrant rights groups welcomed the measure.
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, called it "fundamental and way overdue."
Also on Thursday, Cannella led a group calling on Republicans in the U.S. Congress to take action on broader immigration reform.
(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)
By
Sharon Bernstein
SACRAMENTO (Reuters) - California Governor Jerry Brown said on Friday he would sign a bill authorizing the state to provide driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, a last-minute reversal of his position.
SACRAMENTO (Reuters) - California Governor Jerry Brown said on Friday he would sign a bill authorizing the state to provide driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, a last-minute reversal of his position.
Brown said he approved of the measure, which its author had withdrawn on Thursday under the threat of a veto, capping a full day of lobbying by California politicians for immigration reform at the federal level.
"This bill will enable millions of people to get to work safely and legally," Brown, a Democrat, said in an email sent to reporters shortly after midnight. "Hopefully it will send a message to Washington that immigration reform is long past due."
Over the past year, nine states and the District of Columbia have passed laws enabling undocumented immigrants to drive legally. In California, lawmakers and governors have routinely rebuffed such efforts.
Just on Thursday, Assemblyman Luis Alejo, a Democrat from the agricultural town of Salinas, told Reuters that he was withdrawing the bill he had written until next year, largely because of concerns expressed by Brown.
The governor, Alejo said, wanted to make sure the new licenses complied with federal law requiring them to clearly indicate the driver was undocumented.
For example, he said, Utah licenses for people who cannot show they are in the country legally bear the words "temporary visitor's driver license" on the front.
Alejo said he would prefer California's licenses to be more discreet, with small wording on the back indicating that the license was not to be used for identification purposes.
He withdrew the bill, promising to bring it up again next year. But late in the day on Thursday, just hours before the legislature recessed for the year, Alejo accepted amendments that would make the distinction more clear.
After Brown's objections were satisfied, both houses of the state legislature quickly passed the bill, with a number of Republicans joining the Democratic majority to vote for it.
It was approved by votes of 28-8 in the California Senate and 55-19 in the Assembly.
"We need those living here and sharing our roads to be educated and insured," said Republican state Senator Anthony Cannella. "There are both social and financial reasons to provide licenses to immigrants who are part of our communities."
Latino organizations and immigrant rights groups welcomed the measure.
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, called it "fundamental and way overdue."
Also on Thursday, Cannella led a group calling on Republicans in the U.S. Congress to take action on broader immigration reform.
(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)
State passes bill to license more drivers who are here illegally
By Patrick McGreevy and Melanie Mason, Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO — Laboring late into the night Thursday to finish their work for the year, state lawmakers acted to allow many more immigrants who are in the country illegally to obtain California driver's licenses, a measure Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign.
A flurry of additional proposals sent to the governor would also affect immigrants, as well as gun users, teachers and job applicants. In addition, nannies, private healthcare aides and some other domestic workers would receive overtime pay under bill also headed for the governor's desk.
The driver's license measure would significantly expand the number of immigrants in the country illegally who could have such documents. Some young, undocumented residents are already eligible for licenses under state law, if they qualify for temporary federal work permits.
"This bill will enable millions of people to get to work safely and legally," Brown said in a statement issued immediately after the bill passed. "Hopefully, it will send a message to Washington that immigration reform is long past due."
The bill, AB 60, by Assemblyman Luis Alejo (D-Watsonville), originally would have provided licenses to immigrants who could show that they pay taxes or otherwise work in the United States. But it was changed to ask the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine what documentation would be required.
The bill requires a special mark and notation on the licenses, the initials DP (driver's privilege) instead of DL (driver's license). The notation would say the document "does not establish eligibility for employment or public benefit."
"In a perfect world we would have no mark on our driver's license," said Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens). But, he added, "there are hardworking immigrants who need driver's licenses to do the basic things many of us take for granted."
Another bill affecting immigrants, introduced last week to allow law licenses for people in the country illegally, also cleared the Legislature.
The measure, AB 1024 by Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego) and backed by the Latino Caucus, was prompted by the well-publicized case of Sergio Garcia, who was brought to the country illegally as a minor and seeks a license to practice law.
The California Supreme Court, in a hearing last week, indicated that federal law may prohibit illegal immigrants from obtaining law licenses. The court indicated the Legislature could act to address such cases.
Another measure would clamp down on fraud by people providing immigration services. That bill, AB 1159, also by Gonzalez, is intended to protect consumers by barring attorneys and consultants from accepting money for services related to changes in federal immigration laws before such changes have passed.
"People out there today are accepting payments for people to get into a line that doesn't exist," Gonzalez said.
A labor measure, the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights, would require time-and-a-half pay when personal attendants put in more than nine hours in a day or 45 hours in a week. Provisions to require meal breaks, rest periods and other benefits were dropped from the bill before it passed.
It also would mandate that the governor convene a committee of personal attendants to study the effects of the requirements on the attendants and their employers.
Assemblyman Roger Hernandez (D-West Covina) said domestic workers provide backbreaking care for children, seniors and the disabled, "yet they lack basic labor protections that any worker is afforded under state law and federal law."
Opponents said the measure could hurt low-income seniors who depend on home healthcare aides.
Assemblyman Allan R. Mansoor (R-Costa Mesa) said AB 241 would "disrupt the continuity of care with its restriction on working hours and make care more costly."
Brown vetoed a similar measure last year by the same author, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco).
Legislators also moved to expand the state's already stringent gun controls, voting to outlaw sales of rifles with detachable magazines and enlarge the list of crimes that result in a 10-year ban on possession of firearms.
Under SB 374, by Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), those who already own assault weapons without fixed magazines would be required to register them by July 1, 2014. A second bill, by state Sen. Lois Wolk (D-Davis), would expand the list of crimes that could disqualify Californians from possessing guns.
Wolk's bill would extend the ban to those convicted twice in three years of crimes that include being under the influence of a controlled drug, driving while intoxicated and possession or sale of some controlled substances.
Thursday's action follows the approval of nine gun-control bills earlier in the week in a state with some of the nation's toughest restrictions already on the books. The measures were introduced in response to the shooting death of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut last year.
Lawmakers also sent the governor a bill to criminalize "revenge porn." They want to make it a misdemeanor to cause someone "substantial emotional distress or humiliation" by posting pictures of that person, of a sexual nature, on the Internet without the subject's consent.
Sen. Anthony Cannella (R-Ceres) introduced the proposal in response to a relatively new phenomenon occurring when some couples end their relationship badly: One of the pair retaliates by putting nude pictures of the other online.
"It's a real and growing problem that has destroyed lives and continues to destroy lives," Cannella said.
The Legislature also approved a bill to streamline discipline and dismissal for teachers for misconduct.
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima) said AB 375 would save time and money "with the primary objective of keeping our students safe." The bill was introduced by Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan (D-Alamo).
Opponents said it would hamper the ability of school districts to fully investigate and act against teachers accused of sexual abuse against children.
The measure was supported by the California Teachers Assn. and United Teachers Los Angeles but opposed by groups representing school boards and administrators.
It "may compel school districts to pay a teacher to leave for immoral or unprofessional conduct rather than move to dismissal," said Wes Smith, executive director of the Assn. of California School Administrators.
Another bill lawmakers passed would prohibit state and local agencies from requesting a job applicant's criminal record on an initial job application. Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) said his bill, AB 281, would allow people with a criminal history "to compete fairly for employment without compromising safety and security on the job."
Meanwhile, Lara shelved a proposal to eliminate the tax-exempt status of nonprofit groups such as the Boy Scouts of America that do not allow gay members. The bill would have affected state taxes only.
The Boy Scouts recently decided to allow openly gay boys to join but did not lift its ban on gays serving as adult leaders. Lara said he wanted time to refine the bill before it returns for a vote next year.
See the article at http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-77387557/
patrick.mcgreevy@latimes.com
melanie.mason@latimes.com
Times staff writer Anthony York contributed to this report.
A flurry of additional proposals sent to the governor would also affect immigrants, as well as gun users, teachers and job applicants. In addition, nannies, private healthcare aides and some other domestic workers would receive overtime pay under bill also headed for the governor's desk.
The driver's license measure would significantly expand the number of immigrants in the country illegally who could have such documents. Some young, undocumented residents are already eligible for licenses under state law, if they qualify for temporary federal work permits.
"This bill will enable millions of people to get to work safely and legally," Brown said in a statement issued immediately after the bill passed. "Hopefully, it will send a message to Washington that immigration reform is long past due."
The bill, AB 60, by Assemblyman Luis Alejo (D-Watsonville), originally would have provided licenses to immigrants who could show that they pay taxes or otherwise work in the United States. But it was changed to ask the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine what documentation would be required.
The bill requires a special mark and notation on the licenses, the initials DP (driver's privilege) instead of DL (driver's license). The notation would say the document "does not establish eligibility for employment or public benefit."
"In a perfect world we would have no mark on our driver's license," said Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens). But, he added, "there are hardworking immigrants who need driver's licenses to do the basic things many of us take for granted."
Another bill affecting immigrants, introduced last week to allow law licenses for people in the country illegally, also cleared the Legislature.
The measure, AB 1024 by Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego) and backed by the Latino Caucus, was prompted by the well-publicized case of Sergio Garcia, who was brought to the country illegally as a minor and seeks a license to practice law.
The California Supreme Court, in a hearing last week, indicated that federal law may prohibit illegal immigrants from obtaining law licenses. The court indicated the Legislature could act to address such cases.
Another measure would clamp down on fraud by people providing immigration services. That bill, AB 1159, also by Gonzalez, is intended to protect consumers by barring attorneys and consultants from accepting money for services related to changes in federal immigration laws before such changes have passed.
"People out there today are accepting payments for people to get into a line that doesn't exist," Gonzalez said.
A labor measure, the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights, would require time-and-a-half pay when personal attendants put in more than nine hours in a day or 45 hours in a week. Provisions to require meal breaks, rest periods and other benefits were dropped from the bill before it passed.
It also would mandate that the governor convene a committee of personal attendants to study the effects of the requirements on the attendants and their employers.
Assemblyman Roger Hernandez (D-West Covina) said domestic workers provide backbreaking care for children, seniors and the disabled, "yet they lack basic labor protections that any worker is afforded under state law and federal law."
Opponents said the measure could hurt low-income seniors who depend on home healthcare aides.
Assemblyman Allan R. Mansoor (R-Costa Mesa) said AB 241 would "disrupt the continuity of care with its restriction on working hours and make care more costly."
Brown vetoed a similar measure last year by the same author, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco).
Legislators also moved to expand the state's already stringent gun controls, voting to outlaw sales of rifles with detachable magazines and enlarge the list of crimes that result in a 10-year ban on possession of firearms.
Under SB 374, by Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), those who already own assault weapons without fixed magazines would be required to register them by July 1, 2014. A second bill, by state Sen. Lois Wolk (D-Davis), would expand the list of crimes that could disqualify Californians from possessing guns.
Wolk's bill would extend the ban to those convicted twice in three years of crimes that include being under the influence of a controlled drug, driving while intoxicated and possession or sale of some controlled substances.
Thursday's action follows the approval of nine gun-control bills earlier in the week in a state with some of the nation's toughest restrictions already on the books. The measures were introduced in response to the shooting death of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut last year.
Lawmakers also sent the governor a bill to criminalize "revenge porn." They want to make it a misdemeanor to cause someone "substantial emotional distress or humiliation" by posting pictures of that person, of a sexual nature, on the Internet without the subject's consent.
Sen. Anthony Cannella (R-Ceres) introduced the proposal in response to a relatively new phenomenon occurring when some couples end their relationship badly: One of the pair retaliates by putting nude pictures of the other online.
"It's a real and growing problem that has destroyed lives and continues to destroy lives," Cannella said.
The Legislature also approved a bill to streamline discipline and dismissal for teachers for misconduct.
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima) said AB 375 would save time and money "with the primary objective of keeping our students safe." The bill was introduced by Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan (D-Alamo).
Opponents said it would hamper the ability of school districts to fully investigate and act against teachers accused of sexual abuse against children.
The measure was supported by the California Teachers Assn. and United Teachers Los Angeles but opposed by groups representing school boards and administrators.
It "may compel school districts to pay a teacher to leave for immoral or unprofessional conduct rather than move to dismissal," said Wes Smith, executive director of the Assn. of California School Administrators.
Another bill lawmakers passed would prohibit state and local agencies from requesting a job applicant's criminal record on an initial job application. Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) said his bill, AB 281, would allow people with a criminal history "to compete fairly for employment without compromising safety and security on the job."
Meanwhile, Lara shelved a proposal to eliminate the tax-exempt status of nonprofit groups such as the Boy Scouts of America that do not allow gay members. The bill would have affected state taxes only.
The Boy Scouts recently decided to allow openly gay boys to join but did not lift its ban on gays serving as adult leaders. Lara said he wanted time to refine the bill before it returns for a vote next year.
See the article at http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-77387557/
patrick.mcgreevy@latimes.com
melanie.mason@latimes.com
Times staff writer Anthony York contributed to this report.
Immigration officials to limit solitary confinement after human rights outcry
Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News
Immigration
and Customs Enforcement will limit its use of solitary confinement for the tens
of thousands of immigrants in custody after complaints from human rights
organizations that the punishment was damaging detainees’ mental health.
ICE announced this week that punitive solitary confinement should be “used only as a last resort” with detainees who have special disabilities such as mental illness. Holding detainees in isolation for more than two weeks at a time — the point at which mental health experts say irreparable mental harm might be done to a person — should be avoided if possible, the new policy also states.
As of March, about 300 of the approximately 30,000 immigrants in the sprawling detention system were held in solitary every day, according to a review by The New York Times. Dozens were held for periods of longer than two months.
Under the new policy, ICE officials must justify in writing why they are holding people in isolation for longer than two weeks. (The previous time frame was a month.) The policy also calls for the formation of a subcommittee to make sure immigrants aren’t being held in isolation excessively. Prisons and detention centers that segregate some detainees more than others will be subject to review.
The policy falls far short of ending the practice of isolation altogether, which is what criminal justice and human rights groups have called for.
The nonprofit National Immigrant Justice Center wrote in a report released last year that solitary confinement is inappropriately punitive for immigrant detainees, most of whom are not serving criminal sentences. Most detainees are being held to ensure they attend their court date and are eventually deported, not to punish them, the groups argue. Unlike criminal defendants, immigrant detainees are also not appointed defense lawyers by the state, which means it can be difficult for them to appeal their treatment.
“It’s a very invisible system. There’s no one from the outside looking in,” said Mary Meg McCarthy, the center’s executive director.
Still, McCarthy praised the new policy, saying it was a step toward greater transparency.
The immigrant group’s report found that some detainees have been held for as long as eight months in isolation, and that many institutions use solitary as a means of punishment for minor infractions, such as speaking Spanish. Cobb County Jail in Georgia required detainees in solitary to wear “double restraints” and only allowed them to exercise outside once every 30 days.
Other facilities fed their solitary detainees “nutraloaf” — a ground-up meatloaflike dish — as punishment. Some had written policies stating all inmates with “homosexual tendencies” should be automatically placed in solitary.
The United Nation's leading authority on torture reported in 2011 that after 15 days, harmful psychological effects of solitary confinement can become permanent. Some people held alone for long periods of time report disorientation, panic attacks and even hallucinations.
The
new directive urges officials to consider whether a detainee in solitary could
be transferred, released to the general population or even released from custody
altogether and monitored. The policy clarifies that people might not be placed
in detention solely based on their age, gender or any disability.
Border Wedding Ceremony Highlights Immigration Battle
August 27, 2013
PASO DEL NORTE BRIDGE — The inches Maricruz Valtierra Zuniga
stood from the United States border on Tuesday morning could be as close as the
new bride ever gets to this country.
In a wedding ceremony atop the international bridge, witnessed
by family members, a U.S. congressman and Customs and Border Protection agents,
Valtierra, a 25-year-old from Mexico, married her longtime boyfriend, Edgar
Falcon, 27, a U.S. citizen who calls El Paso home. A mistake authorities say
Valtierra made when she was a teenager — falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen
— means she is barred from ever entering this country, or establishing a life here
with her husband.
“Yes, I can still go to Juárez to see her,” Falcon said,
acknowledging that other couples are separated by hundreds or thousands of
miles. “But the whole dynamic is that in order to live with her and start a
family, I have to exile myself out of my own country.”
A 1996 immigration bill signed by then-President Bill Clinton
made falsely claiming U.S. citizenship an offense so serious that it barred
offenders from ever reentering the country. Falcon said that in 2005, when
oral declarations of citizenship were still common, Valtierra's older sister
incorrectly claimed that the siblings were U.S. citizens. Falcon said he and
his fiancee did not realize how dire the situation was until they decided to
get married and visited the U.S. Consulate in Ciudad Juárez.
Tuesday’s nuptials on the bridge connecting the sister cities
was by all accounts a publicity stunt. But Falcon said they did it to send a
message.
“We want to present another face to America,” he said. “Immigration does not
only affect illegal immigrants but it also affects us as U.S. citizens and is
affecting a lot of families.”
About a year and a half ago, Falcon reached out to American Families United
(AFU), a pro-immigration reform organization that concentrates specifically on
the complexities of marriage and immigration. The group has worked with U.S.
Rep. Beto O’Rouke, D-El Paso,
who was on hand Tuesday morning to witness the ceremony, give the newlyweds a
wedding gift, and discuss legislation he intends to file to address Falcon and
Valtierra’s unique situation.
O’Rourke said the American Families United Act would allow
Department of Homeland Security officials or U.S. immigration judges the
discretion to determine the outcome in deportation or inadmissibility
proceedings when a person is an immediate family member of a U.S. citizen. It
would also establish waivers under which certain applicants — including those
with a history of misrepresenting their legal status — could reside in the U.S.
while their applications are being reviewed. The congressman said he intends to
file the legislation when members return next month after their August recess.
It is unclear what path the proposed legislation will take, but
O’Rourke acknowledged intense lobbying lay ahead.
“Our message to Republicans is, immigration reform really
addresses the problem of the undocumented immigrants in the United States,” he
said. “What about a guy like Edgar who is a U.S. citizen who wants to be with
his family? This picture here says it all.”
Republicans in the U.S. House have said they have no intention
of tackling an omnibus immigration bill the way the Senate did. Instead, they
say they will take a piecemeal approach and focus on security at the border
first.
The tone doesn’t appear ripe for compromise. Late last
week, U.S. Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., the chairman of the powerful House
Judiciary Committee, wrote
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano urging a review of
the country’s process for accepting asylum seekers. The chairman argued that
the system had been gamed after officials recorded a spike in the number of
requests from Mexican nationals seeking protection from gangs, a so-called
credible-fear claim.
Two days later, the chairman issued a statement criticizing an
Aug. 23 directive
from the White House to Immigration and Customs Enforcement urging a review of
deportation cases involving adults who are the primary caretakers of minors;
parents or guardians involved in a family court proceeding; or parents or
guardians of minor children who are citizens or permanent residents of the U.S.
O’Rourke said he wants to take a page from the GOP handbook and
stress family unity.
“It’s incumbent upon me and others to try to work with Chairman
Goodlatte,” he said. “I will make the case that we have U.S. citizens in his
district, and certainly in mine, who just want to be with their families. I
can’t think of a more core and American value than family reunification.”
Bruce Morrison, AFU’s legislative director, said that under
existing rules, Falcon is forced to choose between his love and his country.
“This is not about asylum, this is not about illegal border
crossings,” he said. “The important thing about making public policy is to be
able to tell one set of facts from the other. They’re dramatizing that their
love is bigger than the border.”
See the entire article at http://www.texastribune.org/2013/08/27/wedding-ceremony-seeks-highlight-immigration-battl/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)