By Lisa Mascaro and Brian Bennett, Washington Bureau
May 8, 2013, 6:37 p.m.
WASHINGTON — The immigration reform bill
crafted by a bipartisan group of senators has deeply split the Republican
minority even as lawmakers prepare to take the first votes on the proposal
Thursday.
Alabama's Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions, a conservative former prosecutor
with a courtly drawl, has emerged as the leading opponent of the bill. He is
aiming at his GOP colleagues with unusual zeal, and calls out
the architects of the bill as, essentially, dishonest.
"Sen. Flake is wrong: It's not a 13-year path to citizenship or
welfare," blared one recent missive from Sessions targeting Arizona's
Republican senator, Jeff Flake, who helped draft the legislation. "The
mass legalization occurs immediately."
Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, another Republican author of the bill,
punches back almost daily with his own "Myth vs. Fact" campaign,
separating what he considers truth and fiction in the immigration debate — with
much of the latter attributed to his fellow Republicans.
"MYTH: This bill will hurt American workers,"
reads one recent entry fingering Sessions as the perpetrator.
Republicans are not accustomed to this sort of public
infighting, especially in the Senate.
But recent elections changed that as the dominance of
the GOP's right flank grew. At the same time, its leaders have sought to
broaden the party's appeal to minority and female voters, who have recoiled
from the right turn.
The immigration debate splits Republicans with an
emotional tone not apparent in recent rifts on the budget and other top issues.
A growing coalition of religious and business leaders
has rallied around the argument that newcomers bring many benefits to the
nation. On the other side, supporters of more restrictive policies see high
levels of immigration as a drag on the wages of U.S. workers and a threat to
the country's traditional culture.
"Our duty is to represent the people that are here,
the people whose parents fought the wars and made America great first,"
Sessions said Wednesday as he walked through the Senate halls. "And even
though we have sympathy for the people who want to come here — and even those
who've been here a long time illegally, we have sympathy for them — we need to
be sure that what we do does not place our workers, our people who need jobs,
at an adverse advantage."
"I believe that's the moral position. I believe
that's the right legal position," he said.
The divide within the party will be on full display
Thursday as the Senate Judiciary Committee
begins the painstaking task of reviewing the 844-page bill and debating
amendments, which is expected to take the rest of the month.
The bipartisan proposal drafted by four Republican and
four Democratic senators involves complex trade-offs. It would beef up security
on the Southwestern
border to prevent future illegal crossings and create
new guest-worker programs, particularly for low-skilled labor. Employers would
be required to verify the legal status of all workers.
Within 13 years, most of the estimated 11 million people
who have entered the country illegally or overstayed visas would eligible for
citizenship if they pay back taxes, fines and fees. Some immigrants who work in
agriculture or who were brought to this country as minors and now serve in the
military or attend college could begin the legalization process sooner.
Hundreds of amendments have been proposed. Some
Republicans have proposed changes that would gut the overhaul. Some Democrats
would extend immigration rights to gay couples, a move others in their party
oppose because it would cost crucial GOP support.
But it is the Republican feud that is the most stark.
The party's leadership has embraced reform, believing it
will help Republicans with Latino voters, who have tilted heavily toward
Democrats in recent national elections — dramatically so in President Obama's reelection.
"The fact of the matter is, some of our friends are
on the wrong side of the line," said one Republican aide, who asked for
anonymity to discuss the party tensions. "They get hit with some of the
shrapnel."
Sessions has attacked the bill in the same vigorous way
he pushed for convictions as a U.S. attorney in Alabama.
No comments:
Post a Comment