DMV Extends Office Hours and Adds Appointments For First-Time Driver License Applicants



Contact:  Office of Public Affairs
2415 First Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 657–6437 | dmvpublicaffairs@dmv.ca.gov

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 12, 2014

DMV Extends Office Hours and Adds Appointments For First-Time Driver License Applicants

SACRAMENTO — The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) today announced that it is extending office hours and adding appointment opportunities to support the issuance of all original driver licenses, including licenses that will be issued under AB 60 starting on January 2, 2015.

“DMV is committed to providing excellent customer service to all Californians," said DMV Director Jean Shiomoto. "Customers with appointments have much shorter wait times, and now all customers seeking new driver licenses will have extra appointment opportunities.”

DMV anticipates processing approximately 1.4 million additional driver license applications during the first three years after implementation of AB 60. Some of the additional services DMV will be offering include:

  • Extended Saturday office hours by appointment for all new driver license applicants at up to 60 DMV field offices across California starting Saturday, January 3, 2015.
  • Increased number of available appointments in many field offices that will hire additional staff.
  • New driver license applicants will be able to schedule appointments with the DMV up to 90 days in advance, double the current 45-day window. 
  • Starting December 1, 2014, all first-time driver license applicants must make an appointment to visit their local DMV office. However, four new driver license processing centers will continue to offer walk-in (and appointment) service: Lompoc, Stanton, Granada Hills (all opening November 17, 2014) and San Jose (opening December 1, 2014). Appointments are recommended.

These additional services will be available to all customers seeking an original driver license—meaning the applicant’s first license received in California—whether under AB 60 or otherwise. Customers applying for an original driver license will need to do the following:

  • Make an appointment to visit a DMV field office up to 90 days in advance (or walk-in or appointment at the temporary driver license processing centers in Lompoc, Stanton, Granada Hills or San Jose)
  • Study for the driver license exam
  • Complete a driver license application form (DL 44) available at the DMV office
  • Provide DMV with either:
    • Social security number and proof of identity and legal presence; or
    • Proof of identity and California residency under AB 60. Last week, DMV posted the list of documents that applicants will need to bring to DMV to obtain a new driver license under AB 60. Details regarding these documents are available on the AB 60 webpage at http://apps.dmv.ca.gov/ab60/index.html
  • Pass a vision test, TouchScreen knowledge (written) test, and if applicable, a road sign test
  • Give a thumb print
  • Have a picture taken
  • Schedule a future appointment for the behind-the-wheel driving test

Applicants under 18 applying for an original driver license will also need to submit proof of driver education completion. For further information about obtaining a new driver license, refer to the California Driver Handbook or visit http://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/dmv/dl/driverhandbooks.

It is easy to make an appointment to come into a DMV field office; you can make an appointment online, use the DMV now app, or call 1-800-777-0133.  Appointments are available up to 90 days in advance for new driver licenses and 45 days in advance for other services.  

Stop Notario Fraud!



AILA PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT WARNS AGAINST IMMIGRATION SCAMS AS EXECUTIVE ACTION IS ANNOUNCED

Don’t become a victim of dishonest immigration consultants often known as “notarios.” Immigration consultants, notaries public, and notarios cannot represent you in the immigration process. These people—especially notarios—prey on immigrants, often from the same ethnic community as the notarios themselves.

Notarios will take your money and your dreams!

Many noncitizens find out that they will never get their green card or other immigration benefits because an unqualified immigration consultant or notario unlawfully working as an immigration lawyer destroyed their dreams.

Protect your family’s dreams

To avoid fraud, use your common sense. Many people hear what they want to hear—be smart! If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Don’t believe it if someone tells you about a secret new immigration law or claims to have connections or special influence with any government office or agency. Follow these simple guidelines.

Take action to get help and stop the notario from harming others!

If you have been harmed by a notario or an immigration consultant, you can take action that may help you and stop the person from harming others.

We want to help!

The resources on this website are meant to:



Click here to view the video in another window.

¡Pare el Fraude Notarial!


AILA ADVIERTE AL PÚBLICO SOBRE LOS RIESGOS DE ESTAFAS DE INMIGRACIÓN MIENTRAS SE ANUNCIA ACCIÓN EJECUTIVA


No se convierta en una víctima de los consultores de inmigración deshonestos, generalmente conocidos como “notarios”. Los consultores de inmigración, los notarios públicos y los notarios no pueden representarle en el proceso de inmigración. Estas personas, especialmente los notarios, se aprovechan de los inmigrantes, quienes muchas veces pertenecen a la misma comunidad que los mismos notarios.

¡Los notarios se llevarán su dinero y sus sueños!

Muchas personas no ciudadanas descubren que nunca recibirán su tarjeta de inmigración ni otros beneficios de inmigración porque un consultor de inmigración o notario no competente que trabaja ilegalmente como abogado de inmigración destruyó sus sueños

Proteja los sueños de su familia

Para evitar fraudes, use su sentido común. Muchas personas escuchan lo que quieren escuchar, ¡sea inteligente! Si parece demasiado bueno para ser verdad, probablemente así sea. No confíe en una persona que le comenta acerca de una nueva ley secreta de inmigración o le asegura tener contactos o influencias especiales en algún ente u organismo gubernamental.

¡Tome medidas para obtener ayuda y evitar que los notarios perjudiquen a otras personas!

Si usted ha sido perjudicado por un notario o consultor de inmigración, puede tomar medidas que lo protejan y eviten que la persona cause daños a otros.

¡Queremos ayudar!

Los recursos de este sitio web tienen los siguientes objetivos:
  • Ayudar a evitar que los inmigrantes sean víctimas de los notarios
  • Proporcionar recursos para las personas que han sido víctimas de notarios
  • Brindar información y recursos a los abogados que trabajan con las víctimas para ayudarlos a solucionar los delitos cometidos por consultores fraudulentos que ejercen las leyes de inmigración de manera ilegal.
  • Ayudar a los inmigrantes a encontrar proveedores de servicios legales competentes y económicos.





Click here to view the video in another window.



California Attorney General: Avoid Common Immigration Scams, Only Licensed Lawyers Can Give Legal Advice



State of California Department of Justice

Office of the Attorney General

Kamala D. Harris ~ Attorney General
http://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/immigration_consultants


Immigration Consultants

If you need help with your immigration status, be careful who you see. Only lawyers licensed to practice in state or federal courts can give legal advice. Lawyers or representatives accredited by the immigration court can represent you in immigration court. In California, notaries public, paralegals, accredited representatives and immigration consultants are not necessarily lawyers.

It is against the law for an immigration consultant to give legal advice. An immigration consultant can only give you non-legal help, like translating your answers to the questions on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) forms, getting copies of supporting documents, and, if you ask them to, submitting the forms to the INS. Only an attorney can give you legal advice, such as advising you about what forms to file with the INS.

Visit Attorney General's Office of Immigrant Assistance to find publications in these languages:

Armenian | Chinese | Hmong | Korean | Spanish | Vietnamese.

Scam artists can cause you to lose thousands of dollars and harm your immigration status. If you need a lawyer, check with the State Bar of California or local bar associations. An immigration consultant may cost as much as an attorney in the end.

Some common scams:

·        Making false promises and implying he or she has special influence with the INS. Nobody can guarantee you a work permit or any other immigration benefit.

·        Posing as an immigration consultant or lawyer when he or she is not qualified to do so.

·        Taking a consumer's money and not delivering any services.

·        Persuading a consumer to lie on an application or to an INS agent.

·        Keeping a consumer's original documents and charging money to get the documents back.

·        Filing a frivolous application. For example, filing an application for political asylum on behalf of a consumer who does not qualify for asylum.

·        Charging the consumer a total price for all services up front, then demanding more and more money to continue doing work for the consumer.


For Questions and to Report Complaints:

California Department of Justice
Office of Immigrant Assistance
(888) 587-0557


State Bar of California
(800) 843-9053



Local District Attorney

Check your local telephone directory under County Government,
or check the California District Attorneys Associations website.



To Verify An Immigration Consultant Has a $100,000 Bond:

California Secretary of State
(916) 653-4984



For A List of Accredited Representatives:

U.S. Department of Justice

Want to apply for deportation relief? Proceed with caution!



Posted 11/30/2014 11:16 am
Updated 12/01/2014 5:32 pm
 
Legal experts have a message for immigrants who want to apply for President Obama’s new deportation relief programs: proceed with caution.

The president announced last week that his administration will extend deportation relief and offer work permits to up to 5 million immigrants who entered the country illegally or overstayed a visa.

The applications for the new programs likely won’t be released until early 2015, so it’s too early to make the decision to apply, according to Robert E. Juceam, a top lawyer with Fried Frank in New York City and a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

“The decision to file should be made at the time when you have the form and its terms, and you know what the specific technical requirements are,” he said.

The president will extend deportation relief to an estimated 3.7 million parents of children with U.S. citizenship or permanent residency. Another 1.5 million could be eligible for a program aimed at people brought to the U.S. as children.

No president has offered a deportation reprieve on this scale. Yet the move is temporary; successful applicants will be granted a renewable three-year work permit, with no path to citizenship. When Obama leaves office in 2016, the next president could end the program or simply let existing permits expire.

Once federal immigration officials begin the application process, prospective applicants should consult a lawyer to make sure they meet eligibility requirements, since an application for deportation relief “does not provide confidentiality,” according to Juceam.

“Everything that they write, admit and state is usable against them, if for some reason their application is denied,” he said. “They really need to talk to someone before they file.”

Not everyone will be able to afford a lawyer. While the exact cost of legal assistance is subject to several variables, an existing deportation relief program for young people — Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) — can provide some context. Advocacy groups consulted by Fusion say their members have paid between $500 and $2,000 for help applying to DACA, which has been in effect since 2012. In addition to legal expenses, applicants will also face an application fee, expected to cost $465.

For those who meet the qualifications, the biggest question will be whether to risk sharing their personal information with the federal government when the next president could roll back the changes, and potentially use the application data to target them for deportation. Top Republicans such as Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) have spoken out against Obama’s actions.

Still, the rewards will outweigh the risk for many immigrants living in the shadows. Greg Chen, the director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the next president — regardless of party — would have a hard time justifying the expense of a deportation program aimed at parents who have passed a criminal background check and pay taxes.

“It would not be a wise use of finite enforcement resources,” he said. “Is any new president going to go after families who have been part of our community or who are working members of our community?”

Applications won’t be available for a few months, but people interested in deportation relief can begin prepare to apply. Applicants will need to prove their residence in the United States and should collect old leases, credit card bills, wage statements and tax returns, even if they were filed using a different name or Social Security number, Juceam said. If you realize you have a gap in your employment or residential history, track down someone who would be willing to sign a statement verifying any hard-to-prove details.

Prospective applicants should also be wary of scammers posing as immigration lawyers. A coalition of activist groups have already launched a website, adminrelief.org, to help connect people with reputable lawyers and advocacy organizations.

The problem isn’t just unscrupulous actors. Sometimes well-intentioned people want to help, but don’t have the authority to offer legal advice. “You have to be really careful that non-legal volunteers don’t engage in the unauthorized practice of law,” said Mary Meg McCarthy, the executive director of the Chicago-based National Immigrant Justice Center. “That’s one of our greatest fears right now.”

Obama’s huge new immigration plan, explained




Updated by Dara Lind on November 21, 2014, 11:19 a.m. ET @DLind dara@vox.com


1.     President Obama will protect about 4.3 million unauthorized immigrants, including 4 million parents of legal residents, from deportation via a new "deferred action" program.

2.     The White House believes that nearly 5 million unauthorized immigrants will be protected in total, thanks to other reforms.


1) Who will Obama's executive actions help?

 There are two big buckets of relief being granted here.

One is an expansion of a program Obama's already put into place: the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which allows young unauthorized migrants who've come here as children (and who meet a few other requirements) to get temporary protection and work permits. 1.2 million immigrants are eligible for DACA already (although only about 600,000 have actually applied for and received protection).
The other is relief for parents of legal residents of the United States.

There are other small forms of relief that are helping some unauthorized immigrants — some of which we'll get to later.
The White House says that in total, nearly 5 million unauthorized immigrants will be protected from deportation. The two major deferred action programs cover about 4.3 million immigrants.


·        270,000 immigrants who will now be covered under the DACA program

o   Immigrants who are older than 30 now, but still entered before they were 16, are now eligible for DACA.

o   Immigrants who entered after 2007, but before 2010, are now eligible for DACA.
 

·        4 million parents of US citizens or green card holders will be covered under a new program.

o   Only parents who've been in the country for at least five years (since January 1st, 2010) will qualify.

o   Parents will qualify even if their citizen or green-card-holding children are over the age of 18.

 The logic behind the new program: US citizens are allowed to apply for their parents to get legal status, once they've turned 21. But there are rules that make it extremely difficult to get legal status in the US if you've ever been unauthorized — especially if you're not willing to risk leaving the US in the hopes that you might get to come back. And before they turn 21 (or get citizenship), there's nothing anyone can do. So granting parents deferred action allows them to stay in the US until their children can get them permanent legal status.

 
2) How will this program work?

In order for the program to be effective when it officially launches (which is expected to be in spring of 2015), people are going to have to apply. And that could be tricky. After all, these are people who've been living in the shadows for years — and have learned that any interaction with government officials could lead to their deportation.

The good news is that the administration, and community groups, have done something of a test run on the new program — via the DACA program in 2012. The push to get unauthorized immigrants to apply for DACA has created an existing infrastructure that can now be built on for the new, expanded relief programs. But in order to build on that, they're going to need more money and more lawyers. And the government agency running the program, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, doesn't have much money to spend on outreach.

 
3) Is the president granting immigrants legal status? Is this a path to citizenship?

No. Only Congress can do that.

Obama is promising certain classes of immigrants that they won't be deported for a three-year span of time. The program will also issue work permits that are valid for the same amount of time. And in most states, deferred action is also enough to make someone eligible for a driver's license. But as soon as the three years are up, if an immigrant hasn't applied for renewal, he or she is vulnerable to deportation again.
And that assumes that the administration — or a different presidential administration — doesn't stop accepting applications or renewals, killing the program slowly over three years — or eliminating it immediately.

 
4) So a future president can just take away these protections?

Yes. The president has a lot of authority to decide who gets deported, but the next president has just as much authority to make different decisions.

A Republican elected in 2016 could strip all the protections Obama has granted. President Ted Cruz (for example) could even, if he wanted, use the information from deferred-action applications to track down immigrants and deport them.
This creates something of a dilemma for the administration. Politically, the Democratic Party has an incentive to highlight how precarious this new program is — so that Latinos will turn out in 2016. But for the program to be effective as policy, the administration needs to play up its security — so that unauthorized immigrants are willing to apply. That means that the same messengers are going to be saying two different things to Latinos: that they should apply now because the program is safe, but that it could be taken away at any time.

 
5) Why is the president doing this now?

 The Obama administration has been promising for years that it only deports "high-priority" unauthorized immigrants — like convicted criminals — rather than immigrant workers with US-born children. But those promises haven't always been accurate — the 400,000 immigrants that were deported each year of Obama's first term included around 80,000 parents of US citizen children (again, each year). The DACA program has demonstrated that formalized protections work much better than vague promises.

President Obama used to argue that he lacked legal authority to take any broad steps to change immigration policy. But in March 2014 he started a review of deportation policy to see if it could be made more humane. That review was stopped to give Republicans one last chance to pass immigration reform in Congress; they didn't take it, and in June President Obama restarted the review — now promising it would cover executive action for all aspects of the immigration system. The administration delayed announcing any changes this fall, but promised that after the midterm elections they would announce major executive actions.
And even though the Democrats got trounced in the midterms, the administration kept that promise. You can look at this as a way to keep Latino voters enthusiastic about the Democratic Party, since they'd soured some on President Obama for setting deportation records. Or you can look at it as the president doing what he believes is right, to protect his legacy.

 
6) Is it legal for the president to just do this without Congress?

When it comes to immigration, the executive branch has a lot of authority to decide who to deport and who not to deport. Even the conservative legal experts of the Federalist Society agree that Obama has the authority to take actions of this sort.

There's been some argument that tools like deferred action are supposed to exist for very rare individual cases — not to protect millions of unauthorized immigrants, like Obama did with the DACA program and is doing again now. But it's difficult to argue that it was legal to let 1.2 million immigrants apply for deferred action, but not legal to let another 4 million do it.

 
7) Has a president ever done anything like this before?

Presidents have frequently protected unauthorized immigrants from deportation in the past — but never on this scale.

Deferred action has been used a few times in the past — even before the Obama administration created DACA — to protect small groups of people, like foreign students affected by Hurricane Katrina.
The closest historical parallel is probably a program called the Family Fairness program from 1990. George H. W. Bush used executive authority to allow family members of immigrants who were getting legalized through the Reagan amnesty to apply for protection from deportation, covering about 1.4 million people — 40 percent of the unauthorized population at the time. (Likewise, the president's new action covers about 40 percent of the unauthorized population today.)

In both cases, executive action covers people who are going to be eligible for legal status eventually, through their relatives — but are currently at risk of being deported. For Bush, it was the spouses and children of amnesty recipients who'd gotten legal status, but not citizenship. For Obama, it's the parents of US citizens and legal permanent residents.


8) What can Republicans do to stop Obama?

Republicans are united in their displeasure at this development, and they have several options for expressing it. One thing they acknowledge they can't do is "defund" executive action. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services is funded by application fees, not congressional appropriations. But Congress could pass a law rescinding or narrowing presidential deferred action authority.

The Republican House tried to do this earlier in 2014, for the DACA program, passing a bill that would have prevented anyone new from signing up, and preventing current beneficiaries from renewing. Democrats controlled the Senate, so it didn't come to the floor there. Once Republicans take control of the Senate in the New Year, they could pass a similar bill — but Obama would almost certainly veto it.

Rather than a standalone bill, Congress could attach riders killing Obama's immigration programs to the annual appropriations bills. If Obama vetoed the bills (or if Senate Democrats filibustered them) then we'll have another government shutdown.

They can also try to sue to stop the new program — maybe by adding it to their planned lawsuit against the administration over Obamacare's employer mandate.
 

9) What are the other changes Obama is making to immigration policy?

Reforming Secure Communities: The White House is making major changes to its signature immigration enforcement program, called "Secure Communities." Secure Communities sends the fingerprints of anyone booked into a local jail to immigration officials; federal agents can then ask the local cops to hold the inmate, so they can pick him up. Federal officials have come under serious fire for using Secure Communities as a dragnet to deport plenty of unauthorized immigrants who aren't serious criminals, and dozens of cities and states have said that they're only going to honor federal requests to pick up an immigrant in certain cases.

Now, the federal government is following that lead: it's only going to ask state and local officials to hand over an immigrant after she's been convicted of a serious crime (or a third misdemeanor). And even then, instead of asking the state or local jail to hold the immigrant after she would otherwise be released (so ICE agents can pick her up), federal agents will just ask local law enforcement to let them know when the immigrant's due to be released so they can take custody at that point.

Reforming deportation priorities: The Obama administration's boasted for the last several years that most of the people they're deporting are "priorities" for deportation. But those priorities were attacked for being way too broad. Now, the administration is overhauling its priorities. The new priorities target immigrants who've been convicted of serious crimes, and people who entered the US, or were ordered deported, in 2014.

Adhering to these new priorities is going to depend on ICE field agents — who've been extremely resistant to any attempt to limit deportations. But to impose some accountability, an agent's now going to have to prove to his office's director that someone should be deported even though she's not a priority.

Spouses of green-card holders can now apply for legal status in the US: Currently, green-card holders can apply for visas for their spouses, but if the spouse is already in the US as an unauthorized immigrant, that gets extremely hard. A few years ago, the Obama administration started letting spouses of US citizens stay in the US while applying for a waiver that would let them get legal status — instead of having to wait for months outside the country without knowing if they could return. Now, that's being expanded to green-card holders as well. The White House Council of Economic Advisors estimates this will create somewhere between 104,000 and 167,000 new work permits.
More work permits for recent graduates: The administration is looking to expand a program that lets foreign students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields work in the United States for up to 2 1/2 years or so after they graduate.

The program's called Optional Practical Training, and it currently allows students to work in the US for a year after graduation — but if they're STEM professionals, they can apply to stay for an additional 17 months.
The OPT program was expanded in 2012, to cover more fields of study. It's estimated that anywhere from 100,000 to 200,000 immigrants are currently in the US under the OPT program. Senior administration officials are planning further revisions to the system that should lead to 10,000-36,000 more OPT visas.

Making it easier for foreign entrepreneurs to get visas. The administration is planning a more expansive use of its parole authority to make it easier for foreign entrepreneurs who invest in job-creating businesses to move to the United States. CEA envisions 33,000-53,000 new migrants via this channel.


Read the entire article here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DHS Announces Temporary Protected Status Designations for Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone




Release Date: November 20, 2014

WASHINGTON— Due to the outbreak of Ebola virus disease in West Africa, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson has announced his decision to designate Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 months.  As a result, eligible nationals of Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone who are currently residing in the United States may apply for TPS with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The Federal Register notices provide details and procedures for applying for TPS and are available at www.uscis.gov/tps.

The TPS designations for the three countries are effective Nov. 21, 2014 and will be in effect for 18 months. The designations mean that eligible nationals of Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone (and people without nationality who last habitually resided in one of those three countries) will not be removed from the United States and are authorized to work and obtain an Employment Authorization Document (EAD). The 180-day TPS registration period begins Nov. 21, 2014 and runs through May 20, 2015.

To be eligible for TPS, applicants must demonstrate that they satisfy all eligibility criteria, including that they have been “continuously residing” in the United States since Nov. 20, 2014 and “continuously physically present in” the United States since Nov. 21, 2014.  Applicants also undergo thorough security checks.  Individuals with certain criminal records or who pose a threat to national security are not eligible for TPS. The eligibility requirements are fully described in the Federal Register notices and on the TPS Web page atwww.uscis.gov/tps

Liberians currently covered under the two-year extension of Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) based on President Obama’s Sept. 26, 2014 memorandum may apply for TPS. If they do not apply for TPS within the initial 180-day registration period, they risk being ineligible for TPS because they will have missed the initial registration period. Liberians covered by DED who already possess or have applied for an EAD do not need to also apply for one related to this TPS designation. However, such individuals who are granted TPS may request a TPS-related EAD at a later date as long as the TPS designation for Liberia remains in effect.

Applicants may request that USCIS waive any or all fees based on demonstrated inability to pay by filing Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver, or by submitting a written request. Fee-waiver requests must be accompanied by supporting documentation. USCIS will reject any TPS application that does not include the required filing fee or a properly documented fee-waiver request.